Curse of Ra by Four Leaf Gaming โ RTP 96.00%
Free play-money demo โ no deposit, no signup. Demo by SlotsLaunch.
Curse of Ra Overview
Offering a 96.00% return, Curse of Ra by Four Leaf Gaming is a middle-of-the-road slot on the maths and lives or dies on its features. See the full comparison and our measured payout data below.
RTP Analysis
Curse of Ra has a theoretical RTP of 96.00%. This is exactly at the industry average of 96.00%. Compared to other Four Leaf Gaming slots (average 95.27% across 22 titles), it offers a +0.73pp higher return.
Game Details
Data by slot.report & SlotsLaunch
RTP Verdict
Curse of Ra sits within a percentage point of the 96.00% industry norm, so its return is neither an argument for nor against playing it. What separates it from its neighbours is how it pays โ the rhythm of small wins against rare big ones โ which is what the measured data further down describes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the RTP of Curse of Ra?
Is Curse of Ra paying well right now?
Do slots go hot or cold?
Who made Curse of Ra and where can I play it?
How does Curse of Ra's RTP compare to other Four Leaf Gaming slots?
What does the industry-standard maths verdict mean for Curse of Ra?
Is Curse of Ra worth playing?
More Four Leaf Gaming Slots
Explore More Tools
Four Leaf Gaming Slots
Every Four Leaf Gaming title we hold, with published RTP.
Slot RTP Tracker
Published RTP for 5,500+ slots, plus our measured payout data.
Provably Fair Explained
How to check a spin's result was not tampered with.
Crash Game Simulator
Test crash betting strategies risk-free.
EV & Kelly Calculator
Calculate expected value and optimal bet sizing.
Bonus Codes
Latest crypto casino bonus codes updated daily.
Play Curse of Ra for real on Duel.com
Crypto deposits, instant withdrawals, provably fair โ and 50% instant rakeback with code stakesim.
Play on Duel.com โDisclaimer: RTP data is collected from third-party sources and may fluctuate. Past RTP performance does not guarantee future results. Gambling involves risk. 18+ only. Gamble responsibly.





